State Income Taxation of Multijurisdictional Corporations: Reflections on <em>Mobil, Exxon</em>, and H.R. 5076
Hellerstein, Walter
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Most recently cited by1
- 1981Becton, Dickinson & Co. v. Department of Revenue Mass.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
The purpose of this Article is twofold: first, to analyze the Mobil and Exxon decisions; second, to consider the congressional reaction they may engender. Because the terrain that this Article covers may be unfamiliar to some readers, a few further words of introduction may be appropriate. Taken together, the Mobil and Exxon decisions dealt with the three methods of dividing a multijurisdictional corporation's income among the states - specific allocation, separate accounting and apportionment by formula. Each method provides a different solution to the problem of determining the portion of the income of multistate businesses that should be taxable by any one state.