“Spot Zoning”—A Spot That Could Be Removed from the Law

Reynolds Jr., Osborne M.

Journal: Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law

Volume: 48

First Page: 117

Year: 1995

Bluebook Citation: 48 URB. L. ANN.; J. URB. & CONTEMP. L. 117 (1995)

Author: Osborne M. Reynolds Jr: all 12 publications


Abstract

This Article proposes that courts abandon spot zoning terminology and instead focus on the underlying reasons for invalidating zoning: lack of a relationship to a valid police-power purpose, inconsistency with the community plan, or unreasonable discrimination between parcels of land. First, this Article surveys spot zoning cases to demonstrate that courts invalidate zoning for the three reasons just stated, and not simply because it is "spot zoning." Second, this Article demonstrates that the term "spot zoning" is no longer a useful legal term. Finally, this Article argues that courts should abandon the term "spot zoning" in favor of general principles of zoning law.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.