Sovereignty Migrates in U.S. and Mexican Law: Transnational Influences in Plenary Power and Non-Intervention

Hernandez-Lopez, Ernesto

Journal: Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Volume: 40

First Page: 1345

Year: 2007

Bluebook Citation: 40 VAND. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 1345 (2007)

Author: Ernesto A. Hernandez-Lopez: all 18 publications


Abstract

Mexico and the United States exercise sovereignty that is increasingly transnational and less absolute with respect to migration. This is evident in changes to Mexico's norm of non-intervention and the United States' plenary power doctrine, two doctrines rooted in international sovereignty. Both have historically defined sovereign authority in absolute terms, avoiding any foreign influence or domestic limitation. The non-intervention norm prohibits Mexican foreign relations from interfering in another state's domestic affairs.

Traditionally, it barred a foreign policy on migrants in the United States, which led to Mexico's "no policy" on migrants. The U.S. plenary power doctrine labels immigration law as immune from judicial review because the political branches have complete, "plenary" authority over it. Traditionally, the plenary power doctrine barred constitutional limitations to this migration authority.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.