Some Bugaboos in Pre-Trial

Murrah, Alfred P.

Journal: Vanderbilt Law Review

Volume: 7

First Page: 603

Year: 1954

Bluebook Citation: 7 VAND. L. REV. 603 (1954)

Author: Alfred P. Murrah: all 4 publications


Abstract

In view of all that has been written and said for pre-trial conference,' it seems rather superfluous, if not presumptuous, to undertake to add to or enlarge upon the subject. Indeed, it might be efficacious to heed Judge Clark's suggestion that the procedural cause would be better served "if something could be done to stop us judges ... from publishing what we say" about the Rules. But even at the risk of overstating the case, those who have enlisted for the duration' never forego an opportunity to strike a blow on the side of simplified procedure. Pre-trial practice has been acclaimed "one of the greatest contributions to the ministry of justice," and it has been condemned as a "curse," a "joke," a "waste of time and money," and a "means of sand-bagging litigants into a settlement." The wide divergence of views on this important subject deserves some analysis.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.