Short-Termism and Antitrust’s Innovation Paradox

Joshua P. Zoffer, Stanford Law Review & The Stanford Law Review

Journal: Stanford Law Review

Volume: 71

Year: 2019

Bluebook Citation: 71 STAN. L. REV. (2019)

Author: Joshua P. Zoffer: all 4 publications


Abstract

Antitrust law has long struggled to account for the role of innovation in economic production. Dynamic factors like capital stock, investment spending, and productivity growth do not lend themselves to neat doctrinal rules or clear regulatory mandates. And the antitrust literature has long treated “innovation” as either the domain of intellectual property law or a black-box variable, rather than the product of specific intracompany organizational and investment decisions.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.