Settling Sovereign Debt's "Trial of the Century"

Cruces, Juan J. & Samples, Tim R.

Journal: Emory International Law Review

Volume: 31

First Page: 5

Year: 2016

Bluebook Citation: 31 EMORY INT'L L. REV. 5 (2016)

Author: Tim R. Samples: all 6 publications


Abstract

With NML v. Argentina finally poised for settlement negotiations, the authors analyze a subset of the key economic and legal factors underlying this litigation, with a particular emphasis on issues relevant to a potential settlement. This Article documents the wide heterogeneity of holdout rates across Argentina's 150 defaulted bonds and focus the analysis on the seven most held-out bonds. This Article also assesses the returns that investors would have obtained by purchasing the seven-bond basket at different times since 2002. This analysis offers a framework for potential settlement negotiations.

However, with so many holdouts unaccounted for, a settlement with the NML litigants exposes Argentina to the tyranny of the next litigant as long as the current injunctions remain in place. There is a benefit of modifying or lifting these injunctions as Argentina begins negotiating in good faith to reach a reasonable settlement with its holdout creditors.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.