Selecting an Appropriate Damages Expert in a Patent Case; An Examination of the Current Status of Daubert

King, Michael H. & Evans, Steven M.

Journal: Akron Law Review

Volume: 38

Year: 2005

Bluebook Citation: 38 AKRON L. REV. (2005)

Author: Steven M. Evans: all 1 publication


Abstract

The determination of damages is a critical part of any patent case. As a plaintiff, maximizing awarded damages, whether financial or injunctive, is the ultimate objective of the patent case. As a defendant, minimizing or preventing any awarded damages is the ultimate objective. Multimillion dollar verdicts in patent cases are now the norm and hundred plus million dollar verdicts are becoming more frequent.

A lawyer who fails to devote sufficient time to this critical component of a case does the client a disservice. There are generally two types of damages in patent cases: lost profits and a reasonable royalty. A patent owner may seek either lost profits or a reasonable royalty, or a combination of both, as long the recoveries do not overlap. The determination of patent damages awarded is a question of fact, and numerous damage theories exist within the broad categories of both lost profits and a reasonable royalty to help answer that question.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.