Search and Seizure: The Detection of Marijuana by Trained Dogs

Allberry II, Charles Fred

Journal: University of Dayton Law Review

Volume: 2

Year: 1977

Bluebook Citation: 2 U. DAYTON L. REV. (1977)

Author: Charles Fred Allberry Ii: all 3 publications


Abstract

United States v. Bronstein, 521 F.2d 459 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 96 S.Ct. 1121 (1976). Our society has witnessed, in recent years, the growing menace of drug abuse in the United States.

In an effort to curb the distribution and sale of controlled substances such as marijuana, police have resorted to novel means of ferreting out concealed drug caches. The use of specially-trained animals to detect odoriferous drugs among the personal effects of suspicious persons is currently favored by both courts and law enforcement agencies. Recently, in United States v. Bronstein, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the use of specially-trained dogs to detect odors emanating from personal baggage consigned to a public carrier is not a search constitutionally protected by the fourth amendment.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.