Scope of Due Diligence Investigation in Obtaining Title to Valuable Artwork

Phelan, Marilyn E.

Journal: Seattle University Law Review

Volume: 23

First Page: 631

Year: 2000

Bluebook Citation: 23 SEATTLE U. L. REV. 631 (2000)

Author: Marilyn E. Phelan: all 10 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Courts citing this journal article

9th Cir.1
S.D.N.Y.1
Most recently cited by2
  • 2017Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation 9th Cir.
  • 2013Davis v. Carroll S.D.N.Y.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This Article will explore the concept of "due diligence investigation" for valuable art objects and the considerations that properly frame the scope of such an examination. The Article represents that because, as between a dispossessed owner and a good faith purchaser of artworks, equities are balanced in favor of the dispossessed owner, current law has imposed a higher standard of diligence on the purchaser. Thus, the Article will underscore the need for purchasers and collectors to conduct appropriate and comprehensive investigations into title of artworks they acquire or already possess and will demonstrate that a due diligence investigation is the only means by which a potential purchaser can be assured of acquiring good title to valuable artwork. It will demonstrate how existing law entailing an affirmative duty of investigation for buyers and sellers of expensive artworks helps curtail international art theft by encouraging collectors and their agents to use all resources that have proven effective and that are reasonably accessible for identifying stolen art.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.