SALES - IMPLIED WARRANTIES RUNNING TO ULTIMATE CONSUMER - IS PRIVITY OF CONTRACT NECESSARY?

Jackson, William K.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 37

First Page: 982

Year: 1939

Bluebook Citation: 37 MICH. L. REV. 982 (1939)

Author: William K. Jackson: all 9 publications


Abstract

Plaintiff's husband purchased from defendant, a large retailer, minced ham and liverwurst manufactured by another concern. Plaintiff with other members of the family became ill after eating the liverwurst. An appeal was taken from a directed verdict for defendant. Held, when food is sold, there is no implied warranty of wholesomeness running from the retailer to the ultimate consumer; for the remedy is based on contract and limited to parties and privies thereto.

Borucki v. MacKenzie Bros. Co., Inc., (Conn. 1938) 3 A. (2d) 224.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.