Roe v. Workman's Compensation Appeals Board: Something Fishy in California Workers' Compensation Law

Zacharia, Michael E.

Journal: UC Law Journal

Volume: 27

First Page: 637

Year: 1976

Bluebook Citation: 27 UC L.J. 637 (1976)

Author: Michael E. Zacharia: all 3 publications


Abstract

In California an injured employee receives workers compensation from his employer and can also bring an action for damages against a third party tortfeasor. The Labor Code provides the employer with subrogation rights in order to avoid double recovery by the employee. In Roe v. WCAB, the California Supreme Court held that concurrent employer negligence will bar his credit rights and that the WCAB has jurisdiction to determine the issue of employer negligence. This note traces pre-Roe appellate decisions and then analyzes and criticizes the Roe opinion.

Finally, the author proposes an alternative solution utilizing certain comparative negligence principles announced in Li v. Yellow Cab Co.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.