Rights of Privacy-An Analytical Model for the Negative Rights of Attribution

Grant, R. David

Journal: Utah Law Review

Volume: 1992

Year: 1992

Bluebook Citation: 1992 UTAH L. REV. (1992)

Author: R. David Grant: all 3 publications


Abstract

The negative rights of attribution intended for artists by the provisions of the Berne Convention are: (1) the right of an artist to prevent continued attribution of a work of art that has been modified to the detriment of the artist's reputation; (2) the right of an artist to prevent attribution of a work of art not created by the artist; and (3) the right of the artist to remain anonymous or to use a pseudonym in connection with a work of art created by the artist. The right of an artist to prevent continued attribution of a work of art that has been modified is essentially a narrow application of the false light tort. The right of an artist to prevent attribution of a work of art that the artist did not create is essentially a narrow application of the misappropriation of privacy tort. The right of an artist to remain anonymous or to use a pseudonym is also essentially a narrow application of the misappropriation of privacy tort, although these rights have not gained general acceptance.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.