Rewriting Roe v. Wade

Regan, Donald H.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

First Page: 1569

Year: 1979

Bluebook Citation: MICH. L. REV. 1569

Author: Donald H. Regan: all 15 publications


Abstract

Roe v. Wade is one of the most controversial cases the Supreme Court has decided. The result in the case - the establishment of a constitutional right to abortion - was controversial enough. Beyond that, even people who approve of the result have been dissatisfied with the Court's opinion. Others before me have attempted to explain how a better opinion could have been written.

It seems to me, however, that the most promising argument in support of the result of Roe has not yet been made. This essay contains my suggestions for "rewriting" Roe v. Wade

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.