Rethinking Decisionmaking in International Environmental Law: A Process-Oriented Inquiry into Sustainable Development

Rebecca Bratspies

Journal: Yale Journal of International Law

Volume: 32

First Page: 363

Year: 2007

Bluebook Citation: 32 YALE J. INT'L L. 363 (2007)

Author: Rebecca M. Bratspies: all 18 publications


Abstract

Almost forty years ago, the United Nations began recognizing a "rising [environmental] crisis of worldwide proportions." Around the same time, the New Haven School was building worldwide "a jurisprudence of human dignity." That jurisprudence, a combined effort of sociologist Harold D. Lasswell and law professors Myres S. McDougal and Michael Reisman, described itself as "a contextual, policy-oriented jurisprudence, postulating as its overriding goal the dignity of man in an increasingly universal public order." Drawing on insights from the social and behavioral sciences, Lasswell and McDougal developed an elaborate system of legal analysis intended to flesh out the core values of human dignity, and the processes necessary to translate those values into universal theories of legal decisionmaking. Their process-oriented jurisprudence produced an impressive body of scholarship. It remains one of the major theories of law and one of the few that attempts to account for law in both domestic and international arenas.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.