RESTRICTED TESTATION IN NEW ZEALAND, AUSTRALIA AND CANADA

Dainow, Joseph

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 36

First Page: 1107

Year: 1938

Bluebook Citation: 36 MICH. L. REV. 1107 (1938)

Author: Joseph Dainow: all 113 publications


Abstract

One of the long accepted differences between the common law and the civil law has been the freedom of testamentary disposition of the former as contrasted with the limitations of the latter. Thus, while the continental testator was limited in the amount of property that he could leave away from the members of his immediate family, the Englishman could cut them all off without a penny. In other common-law countries the same liberty was continued; but recent years have witnessed important departures.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.