RESTITUTION UNDER THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS: WHAT CONSTITUTES AN UNJUST RETENTION

Jeanblanc, Lindsey R.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 48

First Page: 923

Year: 1950

Bluebook Citation: 48 MICH. L. REV. 923 (1950)

Author: Lindsey R. Jeanblanc: all 4 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2013Kellogg v. Shushereba Vt.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

In order to recover in restitution the plaintiff must establish, first, that a legal benefit was conferred upon the defendant and, second, that the retention of that benefit was unjust. The problem of determining what constitutes a legal benefit in the cases of restitution under the statute of frauds is discussed in another article. The purpose of this article is to examine what does or does not constitute an unjust retention in such cases, including some of the grounds on which the defendant may successfully contend that his retention of a benefit is not unjust.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.