Restitution's Outlaws

Kull, Andrew

Journal: Chicago-Kent Law Review

Volume: 78

First Page: 17

Year: 2003

Bluebook Citation: 78 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 17 (2003)

Author: Andrew Kull: all 15 publications


Abstract

The usual assertion that "restitution is not punitive" is true in the important sense that liability in restitution does not exceed the defendant's enrichment: enhanced or exemplary liability is foreign to this area of the law. On the other hand, restitution incorporates an unmistakably punitive aspect that is given effect in a different fashion: not by enhancing the liability of a disfavored defendant, but by denying relief to a disfavored claimant. The traditional explanation of such outcomes (by recitation of English and Latin maxims) has tended to obscure the extent and the consistency of the law's punitive response.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.