Resolving the Anders Dilemmas: How & Why Texas Should Abandon the Anders Procedure

Ritter, Michael J.

Journal: St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics

Volume: 12

First Page: 94

Year: 2022

Bluebook Citation: 12 ST. MARY'S J. LEGAL MAL. & ETHICS 94 (2022)

Author: Michael J. Ritter: all 5 publications


Abstract

When an indigent defendant has a right to counsel for an appeal, and counsel believes the appeal is wholly frivolous, Texas has adopted the Anders v. California procedure that permits counsel to withdraw from representation and argue to the appellate court why their client’s appeal is wholly frivolous. This Article argues that, either by a change to the disciplinary rules or by judicial decision, Texas should abandon the Anders procedure as other states have. Doing so will promote the integrity of the right to counsel, avoid numerous conflicts and dilemmas created by the Anders procedure, and advance judicial efficiency and public confidence in Texas’s criminal justice system.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.