Removal and the Eleventh Amendment: The Case for District Court Remand Discretion To Avoid a Bifurcated Suit

Berman, Mitchell N.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 92

First Page: 683

Year: 1993

Bluebook Citation: 92 MICH. L. REV. 683 (1993)

Author: Mitchell N. Berman: all 16 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2025DUBOIS D.N.J.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This Note concludes that the Sixth Circuit was half right: when a civil action names both state and private defendants - what this Note terms a "mixed case" - and when the claims against private defendants arise under federal law, the district court must grant removal of the case8 and must remand the claims against the state defendant. However, this Note also observes that the Fifth Circuit probably achieved the better result. After defendants have removed a mixed case to federal court and the district court has remanded the barred claims, the dual court systems and the parties will usually benefit from disposition of the entire case in one proceeding.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.