Remedy, Reason, and the Statute of Frauds: A Critical Economic Analysis

Braunstein, Michael

Journal: Utah Law Review

Volume: 1989

Year: 1989

Bluebook Citation: 1989 UTAH L. REV. (1989)

Author: Michael D. Braunstein: all 5 publications


Abstract

The statute of frauds, which is in effect in every American jurisdiction, provides that certain contracts must be in writing to be enforceable. The statute is not uniformly enforced, and it has many exceptions. The reasons traditionally offered by courts and commentators for these exceptions are inadequate. Traditional explanations posit that the courts create exceptions to the statute of frauds if (1) it is necessary to prevent the statute from being used as a shield for fraud, or (2) the evidentiary purpose of the statute is satisfied by evidence of the existence of the alleged contract that is at least as reliable as a writing.

Such explanations are inadequate because they do not explain what the courts actually do.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.