Remarks on Writing Separately

Ginsburg, Ruth Bader

Journal: Washington Law Review

Volume: 65

First Page: 133

Year: 1990

Bluebook Citation: 65 WASH. L. REV. 133 (1990)

Author: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: all 71 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2008Ex Parte John Dominick Colyandro Tex. App.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Judge Ginsburg compares the styles of appellate opinion writing in United States courts and in those of Great Britain and the civil law countries. She describes as a "middle way" the United States practice of opinions for the court, sometimes accompanied by separate concurrences and dissents. This practice, she observes, contrasts with the British tradition of seriatim opinions by each member of the bench, and with the single, anonymous judgment characteristic of civil law systems. While noting that the Anglo-United States practice of writing separately has gained adherents in the civil law world, she concludes that judges in the United States might profitably consider the styles of jurists abroad and exercise greater restraint before writing separately.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.