Remarks on Advocacy Before the United States Court of International Trade

Restani, Jane A.

Journal: Fordham International Law Journal

Volume: 10

First Page: 141

Year: 1986

Bluebook Citation: 10 FORDHAM INT'L L.J. 141 (1986)

Author: Jane A. Restani: all 5 publications


Abstract

There seems to be a prevailing assumption that advocacy before the United States Court of International Trade (CIT or the court) somehow differs from advocacy in general. I suggest that to a large degree it does not. Despite the similarities to practice in other courts, there are a few matters worth noting about practice in a court that is designed to interpret a few statutes in a uniform manner, especially statutes that are intended to be comprehensive. Now that I have stated the general rules, I would like to mention a few somewhat more philosophical considerations and exceptions.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.