Religious Discrimination and the Role of Arbitration Under Title VII

Edwards, Harry T. & Kaplan, Joel H.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 69

First Page: 599

Year: 1971

Bluebook Citation: 69 MICH. L. REV. 599 (1971)

Author: Harry T. Edwards: all 43 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

One of the major thrusts of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, passed by the 88th Congress of the United States after much procrastination and debate, is title VII, the Equal Employment Opportunity Act, which prohibits selected forms of employment discrimination. In drafting title VII, the proponents of the Act were chiefly concerned with racial discrimination in employment. In fact, the entire Civil Rights Act was written with an eye toward the elimination of the "glaring ... discrimination against Negroes which exists throughout our nation." Given this intent, it is not surprising that, during the hearings and debates preceding the passage of the Act, Congress focused its attention primarily on the race discrimination problem. The legislative history is replete with pronouncements, from friend and foe alike, concerning the impact of the proposed Act on existing patterns of racial prejudice in the United States.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.