Relevance: Definition and Limitations-Conforming the California Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of Evidence

Méndez, Miguel A.

Journal: University of San Francisco Law Review

Volume: 42

Year: 2007

Bluebook Citation: 42 U. S. F. L. REV. (2007)

Author: Miguel A. Mendez: all 16 publications


Abstract

This Article examines from a comparative perspective the rules of evidence relating to relevance and its limits. The Article compares the approaches of the California Evidence Code ("Code") and the Federal Rules of Evidence ("Rules") to challenges to the introduction of evidence on the grounds of irrelevance or on the basis of limits placed on the introduction of relevant evidence.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.