Reinvigorating the Judiciary’s Role in Resolving Interbranch Disputes

Teter, Michael

Journal: Utah Law Review

Volume: 2014

Year: 2014

Bluebook Citation: 2014 UTAH L. REV. (2014)

Author: Michael J. Teter: all 4 publications


Abstract

The Framers established a federal government of three coequal, coordinate branches—each with its own constitutional responsibilities and each charged with checking the other two branches. Indeed, separated functions and balance of power are the two underlying elements of our bedrock constitutional principle of separation of powers. The current style of governance in the Unites States poses a unique and serious threat to that basic principle. Congressional dysfunction prevents the legislative branch from legislating, pushes the executive branch toward assuming greater lawmaking authority, and undermines the ability of both the judiciary and executive branch to fulfill their own constitutional obligations.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.