Regret Theory - Explanation, Evaluation and Implications for the Law

Gelberg, Grant B.

Journal: University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Volume: 36

First Page: 183

Year: 2002

Bluebook Citation: 36 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 183 (2002)

Author: Grant B. Gelberg: all 3 publications


Abstract

This Note discusses regret theory, which offers an alternative explanation of rational behavior in risky or uncertain situations. Unlike traditional law and economics, which is based on expected utility theory, regret theory posits that individuals either rejoice or experience regret after making a decision, and that the anticipation of these feelings influences choices ex ante. In recent years, studies have shown the robustness of regret theory, particularly when individuals compare action to inaction, in disparate feedback environments, and when decisional agency is altered. These, and other factors, influence regret theory's impact on litigant behavior, as well as on the law of contracts, insurance, and torts.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.