Reforming Accretion Analysis Under the NLRA: Supplementing a Borrowed Analysis with Meaningful Policy Considerations

Miner, Matthew S.

Journal: University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Volume: 31

First Page: 515

Year: 1998

Bluebook Citation: 31 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 515 (1998)

Author: Matthew S. Miner: all 3 publications


Abstract

Current accretion analysis utilizes a variety of factors to determine whether to merge a non-unionized group of employees with a unionized group of employees within the same firm. The present construction of the analysis; however, ignores employee views and potential manipulation of the doctrine. By failing to account for these two important factors, current accretion analysis neglects two key concerns of the National Labor Relations Act - preventing employer discrimination and fostering uncoerced employee action and choice. This Note advocates a better approach, which gives proper weight to employee views and considers employer motive to control against the possibility of employers manipulating their workforces to avoid labor obligations.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.