Reflections of a Supreme Court Commissioner

Baude, William

Journal: Minnesota Law Review Vols. 106:2 onward (2021-present)

Volume: 106

First Page: 2631

Year: 2022

Bluebook Citation: 106 2631

Author: William Baude: all 21 publications


Abstract

The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States was given a fundamentally frustrating task: bipartisan expert analysis of an institution whose greatest challengers are political. I served on that commission and offer my own views on Supreme Court reform: Court packing is lawful but unjustified. Term limits, without a constitutional amendment, are not lawful and maybe also unjustified. Generally democratizing the Court through jurisdiction stripping is unlikely to be effective, and doing so through various other means is unlikely to be lawful.

And the Supreme Court’s shadow docket, though not free from trouble, does not admit of simple reforms either. I conclude with some reflections on the commission itself.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.