Reducing the Presumption of Arbitrability

Jennifer Peresie

Journal: Yale Law & Policy Review

Volume: 22

First Page: 453

Year: 2004

Bluebook Citation: 22 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. 453 (2004)

Author: Jennifer L. Peresie: all 3 publications


Abstract

Morrison v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 317 F.3d 646 (6th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Bradford v. Rockwell Semiconductor Systems, Inc., 238 F.3d 549 (4th Cir. 2001).

The United States Supreme Court has expressed a "liberal federal policy favoring arbitration." However, under Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., arbitration agreements are only enforceable if "the prospective litigant effectively may vindicate [his or her] statutory cause of action in the arbitral forum." In Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph, the Supreme Court, applying Gilmer, held that plaintiffs could avoid arbitration by showing the "likelihood" of incurring prohibitive costs.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.