REDEMPTION FROM FORECLOSURE SALE--THE UNIFORM MORTGAGE ACT
Durfee, Edgar Noble & Doddridge, Delmar W.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by3
- 1975International Harvester Credit Corp. v. Ross Kan.
- 1969Damascus Milk Co. v. Morriss Wash. Ct. App.
- 1956First National Bank & Trust Co. v. MacGarvie N.J.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
If it be objected that our proposal is wholly novel and that it is the function of the Uniform Act merely to codify existing law, changing it only in so far as is necessary to remove conflicting rules, we would answer that codification in a strict sense is impossible in a field which presents so many conflicting views as that before us. We also believe that the objection is less forceful when the existing law is wholly statutory and half our states have no such law. And we understand that the commissioners have more and more abandoned the strict ideal of codification and are now entering with some freedom upon the beneficent work of law improvement.