Red Wolf Coalition v. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission: Better Red than Dead

Fitzgerald, Edward A.

Journal: Animal Law Review

Volume: 23

First Page: 273

Year: 2017

Bluebook Citation: 23 ANIMAL L. REV. 273 (2017)

Author: Edward A. Fitzgerald: all 13 publications


Abstract

This Article demonstrates how federal district court decisions have protected the threatened red wolf. The history of red wolf introduction and the Fourth Circuit decision in Gibbs v. Babbitt are reviewed. In 2012, North Carolina allowed coyote hunting in the red wolf recovery area. The District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina correctly issued an injunction stop­ping the action.

The court held North Carolina set in motion events that led to the killing of red wolves and violated federal regulations regarding the taking of red wolves. The resulting settlement agreement precluded state interference with red wolf recovery. Genetic studies have questioned the red wolfs taxonomic status. The Article posits that the red wolf should retain Endangered Species Act protections even if it is a gray wolf-coyote hybrid.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at­tempted to curtail red wolf recovery in 2016. The federal dis­trict court properly halted the proposal.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.