Recent Developments: Sharp v. State: Despite Not Formally Objecting, Defense Counsel Properly Preserved the Issue of Whether the Circuit Court Inappropriately Weighed Defendant's Decision Not to Plead Guilty at Sentencing; The Circuit Court Did Not Impermissibly Consider Defendant's Rejection of the Plea Offer at Sentencing.

Campbell, Colin

Journal: University of Baltimore Law Forum

Volume: 47

Year: 2016

Bluebook Citation: 47 U. BALT. L. F. (2016)

Author: Colin D. Campbell: all 3 publications


Abstract

The Court of Appeals of Maryland held that defense counsel’s statements conveyed an objection to the circuit court’s perceived consideration of the defendant’s decision not to plead guilty at sentencing. Sharp v. State, 446 Md. 669, 113 A.3d 1089 (2016). As a result, the court held that defense counsel sufficiently preserved the issue for appellate review.

Id. at 684, 113 A.3d at 1098. Ultimately, though, the circuit court’s statements at sentencing did not give rise to the inference of an impermissible consideration. Id. at 701, 113 A.3d at 1108.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.