Recent Development: Counts v. State: Absent the Defendant's Consent, the State May Not Amend the Charging Document if the Amendment Changes the Character of the Offense

Shields, Kristin E.

Journal: University of Baltimore Law Forum

Volume: 46

Year: 2016

Bluebook Citation: 46 U. BALT. L. F. (2016)

Author: Kristin E. Shields: all 3 publications


Abstract

The Court of Appeals of Maryland held that amending a charge from theft of property “with a value of less than $1,000” to theft of property “with a value of at least $1,000 but less than $10,000” without the defendant’s consent changed the character of the offense. Counts v. State, 444 Md. 52, 55, 118 A.3d 894, 895 (2015). Therefore, the court held that such action was prejudicial per se because it interfered with the defendant’s right to defend himself by not giving notice of the exact charges against him, thereby violating Maryland Rule 4-204.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.