Recent Development

Staff, Law Review

Journal: Vanderbilt Law Review

Volume: 25

First Page: 623

Year: 1972

Bluebook Citation: 25 VAND. L. REV. 623 (1972)


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
4
Citing decisions
3
Courts citing

Citations by decade

3
1
1970s2020s

Courts citing this journal article

N.H.2
Idaho1
R.I.1
Most recently cited by4

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This Comment will explore the origin, evolution, and refinement of the common-law classifications, with particular focus upon recent decisions abrogating these distinctions in favor of a broader standard of ordinary care under the circumstances. ====== The problem of defining a landowner's' responsibility toward persons who come upon his premises has been the subject of longstanding controversy. While some commentators have argued that the limited responsibility placed by the common law on landowners does not comport with modern principles of negligence liability proponents of the common-law standards have urged that the common-law scheme of entrant classes--trespasser, licensee, invitee--provides a workable approach to the determination of landowners' liability to entrants. This Comment will explore the origin, evolution, and refinement of the common-law classifications, with particular focus upon recent decisions abrogating these distinctions in favor of a broader standard of ordinary care under the circumstances.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.