Recent Antitrust Developments-1964

Handler, Milton

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 63

First Page: 59

Year: 1964

Bluebook Citation: 63 MICH. L. REV. 59 (1964)

Author: Milton Handler: all 66 publications


Abstract

Ever since the passage of the Sherman Act, the courts have consistently refused to permit the requirements of antitrust to be circumvented by the easy expedient of dressing a sale in the vestments of a sham agency agreement. In Dr. Miles Medical, where the Supreme Court first held vertical price fixing unlawful, the seller and buyer denominated their agreement as an "agency," but the Court properly concluded that it was, in fact, a sale. Likewise, in Standard-Magrane, the first occasion on which the Court considered section of the Clayton Act, the seller purported to appoint his customers as agents. Again, the Court cut through to the heart of the transaction and found that, despite its formal trappings, it was not a real agency.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.