Reassessing Turner and Litigating the Must-Carry Law Beyond a Facial Challenge

Warner, R. Matthew

Journal: Federal Communications Law Journal

Volume: 60

Year: 2008

Bluebook Citation: 60 FED. COMM. L.J. (2008)

Author: R. Matthew Warner: all 17 publications


Abstract

In recent decades, the must-carry rules have had a troubled constitutional history. After two sets of rules were struck down by the D.C. Circuit for violating the First Amendment rights of both cable programmers and operators, Congress revised the must-carry rules in the 1992 Cable Act. In 1997, the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, determined that the congressional must-carry law was facially constitutional. However, does the Turner II decision preclude further First Amendment challenges to the must-carry law?

This Note argues that the answer is no and that the time is drawing near for new challenges.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.