Reapportionment in the Supreme Court and Congress: Constitutional Struggle for Fair Representation

Dixon Jr., Robert G.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 63

First Page: 209

Year: 1964

Bluebook Citation: 63 MICH. L. REV. 209 (1964)

Author: Robert G. Dixon Jr: all 15 publications


Abstract

Fair representation is the ultimate goal. At the time of the Reapportionment Decisions, much change was overdue in some states, and at least some change was overdue in most states. We are a democratic people and our institutions presuppose according population a dominant role in formulas of representation. However, by its exclusive focus on bare numbers, the Court may have transformed one of the most intricate, fascinating, and elusive problems of democracy into a simple exercise of applying elementary arithmetic to census data.

In so doing, the Court may have disabled itself from effectively considering the more subtle issues of representation. Reapportionment is a political power struggle, but one looks in vain in the controlling opinions in the Reapportionment Decisions for an awareness and concern regarding the group dynamics of American politics.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.