Really Leaving No Child behind: How the Supreme Court's Student Speech Doctrine Compromises Modern Education Reform - And How It Can Use the In Loco Parentis Doctrine to Change It

Street, Scott J.

Journal: Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest

Volume: 11

First Page: 25

Year: 2008

Bluebook Citation: 11 RICH. J. L. & PUB. INT. 25 (2008)

Author: Scott J. Street: all 3 publications


Abstract

tudent speech" doctrine defined by Tinker in favor of an in loco parentis standard that defers to the expertise of school officials in maintaining a safe, effective, and orderly school environment. Contrary to what its critics assume, an in loco parentis standard would not give school officials carte blanche to violate their students' rights. It would, for example, prohibit school officials from discriminating against students on the basis of viewpoint. But as long as Tinker's student speech doctrine survives, efforts to improve our schools and prepare our children for the rigors of the…

You are reading a preview

Sign in to read the full text of this journal article, along with its citations, treatment history and AI research tools.

Sign in to read the full text

Free to create an account.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.