Reality Check: A Modest Modification to Rationalize Rule 803 Hearsay Exceptions

Richter, Liesa L.

Journal: Fordham Law Review

Volume: 84

First Page: 1473

Year: 2016

Bluebook Citation: 84 FORDHAM L. REV. 1473 (2016)

Author: Liesa L. Richter: all 10 publications


Abstract

The Federal Rules of Evidence (or “the Rules”) identify hearsay that is admissible, notwithstanding the classic hearsay prohibition, by delineating categories of hearsay statements that may be admitted into evidence. For example, “dying declarations” of now-unavailable declarants may be admitted in homicide prosecutions or civil cases. “Excited utterances” relating to a startling event also may be admitted for their truth. The purported justification for admitting certain categories of hearsay rests upon the inherent reliability of human statements uttered in certain contexts, as well as litigants’ need for crucial evidence to build cases.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.