Quiescent Sovereignty of U.S. Territories

Kelly, Michael J

Journal: Marquette Law Review

Volume: 105

First Page: 501

Year: 2022

Bluebook Citation: 105 MARQ. L. REV. 501 (2022)

Author: Michael J. Kelly: all 30 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
Most recently cited by1
  • 2024Dalmau Ramírez y otros v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico y otros

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Under modern democratic theory, the font of sovereignty springs from the people; however, traces of its past as a power emanating from the Crown continue to haunt the domestic and international status of sub-sovereign legal entities such as U.S. Territories. Quiescent sovereignty describes that which is possessed by the people of the Territories; a sovereignty that is theirs, but that is wielded on their behalf by the federal government. Although fiduciary responsibilities attach to this arrangement, cycles of attention/neglect are the modus vivendi. Bilateral relationships between the Territories and the federal government are varied, but such differences should not impact their voices in Congress.

Institutional adjustments to provide more impetus to Territorial issues are readily possible. Just as the European Union came to realize the importance of sub-national input at the federal level by creating the European Union’s Committee of the Regions, so too should the U.S. House of Representatives create a Permanent Select Committee on Territorial Affairs chaired by a Territorial Delegate.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.