QUASI-CONTRACTS-ASSUMPSIT FOR USE AND OCCUPATION OF LAND

Hancox S.Ed., R. O.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 45

First Page: 519

Year: 1947

Bluebook Citation: 45 MICH. L. REV. 519 (1947)

Author: Robert O. Hancox S Ed: all 3 publications


Abstract

Defendant had a right of way over plaintiff's land limited to the transportation of coal mined on that land. Plaintiff seeks to recover for use and occupation of his land by defendant when he exceeded his right by transporting coal mined on adjacent property. Held, the plaintiff is entitled to quasi-contractual recovery of the value of the benefit to defendant based on the prevailing rate of purchase of right of way for transportation of coal over another's land. Raven Red Ash Coal Co., Inc. v. Ball, (Va.

1946) 39 S.E. (2d) 231.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.