Quantifying Liability Under the Architect's Standard of Care

Wright, Murray H. & Boelzner, David E.

Journal: University of Richmond Law Review

Volume: 29

First Page: 1471

Year: 1995

Bluebook Citation: 29 U. RICH. L. REV. 1471 (1995)

Author: Murray H. Wright: all 3 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Courts citing this journal article

Fed. Cl.1
Vt.1
Most recently cited by2
  • 2005C.H. Guernsey & Co. v. United States Fed. Cl.
  • 2001Howard v. Usiak Vt.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

In recent years, architects and other design professionals have become the targets of claims arising from problems encountered in construction projects. In addition to incurring the costs of defending such claims, these design professionals (or their insurers) have often found themselves absorbing the liability for many "errors and omissions" that are difficult to defend when individually excerpted from a substantial project. This treatment of claims for defective design reflects a distortion of the architect's professional standard of care that is justified neither by the contractual liability assumed by the architect nor by the economic balance among the parties involved in a construction project.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.