Punitive Damages, Other Acts Evidence, and the Constitution

Gash, Jim

Journal: Utah Law Review

Volume: 2004

Year: 2004

Bluebook Citation: 2004 UTAH L. REV. (2004)

Author: Jim Gash: all 4 publications


Abstract

The United States Supreme Court is actively engaged in a hostile takeover of the punitive damages jurisprudence that historically has been owned and operated by the states. In so doing, it is fueling the mounting criticism of the Court's constitutionalization of this important area of tort law.' The Court's recent decision in State Farm Mutual A utomobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell represents its latest encroachment, though this time the Court effectively constitutionalizes an important area of evidence law, at least when applied in the punitive damages context.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.