Public Rights After <em>Oil States Energy</em>

MacLeod, Adam J

Journal: Notre Dame Law Review

Volume: 95

First Page: 1281

Year: 2020

Bluebook Citation: 95 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1281 (2020)

Author: Adam J. Macleod: all 10 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2024KENNESTONE HOSPITAL, INC. v. EMORY UNIVERSITY Ga.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

The concept of public rights plays an important role in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the United States. But as the decision in Oil States last Term revealed, the Court has often used the term to refer to three different concepts with different jurisprudential implications. Using insights drawn from historical and analytical jurisprudence, this Article distinguishes the three concepts and examines how each of them is at work in patent law. A precise reading of Oil States also bears lessons for other areas of law that implicate both private rights and duties and the administration of public, regulatory schemes.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.