PTAB Precedential Decision: Putting the Hammer Down on Filing Serial Petitions?

Klein, Ashley N. & Thomas, Warren J.

Journal: Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

Volume: 17

First Page: 29

Year: 2018

Bluebook Citation: 17 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 29 (2018)

Author: Ashley N. Klein: all 1 publication


Abstract

Petitioners for inter partes review proceedings under the America Invents Act routinely file serial petitions to challenge a single patent. Patent owners have criticized such “follow-on” petitions as abusive. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s recent precedential opinion in General Plastic Industrial Co. v. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha, IPR2016-01357, Paper 19 (P.T.A.B. Sept. 6, 2017), lays out seven non-exhaustive factors to guide the Board’s consideration of such “follow-on” petitions.

This Article summarizes the Board’s analysis of follow-on petitions prior to General Plastic, examines how General Plastic has affected petitioners’ success in having such petitions instituted, and suggests strategies for practitioners going-forward.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.