Psychology and The Criminal Law

Meehl, Paul E.

Journal: University of Richmond Law Review

Volume: 5

First Page: 1

Year: 1970

Bluebook Citation: 5 U. RICH. L. REV. 1 (1970)

Author: Paul E. Meehl: all 3 publications


Abstract

The two opposite errors a lawyer may make in evaluating the social scientist's contribution to law are to be overly critical and hostile, or to be unduly impressed and uncritically receptive. I have seen examples of both mistakes. The extreme form of the first attitude is shown by the lawyer who frankly believes that psychology, psychiatry, and sociology are mostly "baloney," pretentious disciplines which have abandoned common-sense knowledge of human life but whose claim to have substituted scientific knowledge is spurious. I would like to believe that this hostile attitude is always based upon misinformation or ignorance; but unfortunately, if I am honest with myself, I must admit that sometimes lawyers feel this way in spite of their being knowledgeable.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.