Protecting States in the New World of Energy Federalism

Lyons, Daniel A.

Journal: Emory Law Journal

Volume: 67

First Page: 921

Year: 2018

Bluebook Citation: 67 EMORY L.J. 921 (2018)

Author: Daniel A. Lyons: all 8 publications


Abstract

In a trilogy of recent cases, the Supreme Court has launched a quiet revolution in energy federalism. With little fanfare, it has abandoned its decades-long effort to divide electricity regulation into mutually exclusive spheres of federal and state authority. Instead it has embraced a more sophisticated concurrent jurisdiction model¿against the wishes of Justice Scalia, who opposed this transformation in his final published dissent. This Article explores the ramifications of this revolution, particularly for state energy regulators.

The shift to concurrent jurisdiction is long overdue. The historic model of the local vertically integrated utility has long been replaced by regional, complex, innovative electricity markets. Concurrent jurisdiction allows regulators to adapt more nimbly to changing market dynamics, unrestrained by the outdated formalism of the old dual federalism model.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.