Property v. Guns: The Level-of-Generality Problem in Wolford

Maureen E. Brady, Stanford Law Review & The Stanford Law Review

Journal: Stanford Law Review

Volume: 55

First Page: 1105

Year: 2003

Bluebook Citation: 55 STAN. L. REV. 1105 (2003)

Author: Maureen E. Brady: all 7 publications


Abstract

In Wolford v. Lopez, the Supreme Court will examine whether states can require property owners to consent before armed individuals enter publicly-accessible private property. Maureen Brady argues this highlights the “level-of-generality problem” rooted in the Court’s historical framework from New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, particularly in relation to firearm regulations. Brady examines the differing interpretations of Founding-era hunting laws and the implications of property ownership signals, concluding that courts should be transparent about their level-of-generality choices and acknowledge how these choices reintroduce means-ends reasoning under another name.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.