Professional Responsibility of the Criminal Defense Lawyer: The Three Hardest Questions

Freedman, Monroe H.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 64

First Page: 1469

Year: 1966

Bluebook Citation: 64 MICH. L. REV. 1469 (1966)

Author: Monroe H. Freedman: all 37 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
4
Citing decisions
4
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
1
1
1
1960s1980s1990s2020s

Courts citing this journal article

D.C.1
D.C. Cir.1
Md. Ct. Spec. App.1
Wash. Ct. App.1
Most recently cited by4
  • 2022Moore v. United States D.C.
  • 1997State v. Berrysmith Wash. Ct. App.
  • 1981State v. Lloyd Md. Ct. Spec. App.
  • 1967Bruce v. United States D.C. Cir.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

In almost any area of legal counseling and advocacy, the lawyer may be faced with the dilemma of either betraying the confidential communications of his client or participating to some extent in the purposeful deception of the court. This problem is nowhere more acute than in the practice of criminal law, particularly in the representation of the indigent accused.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.