Products Liability Tort Reform: Why Virginia Should Adopt the Henderson-Twerski Proposed Revision of Section 402A Restatement (Second) of Torts

Swisher, Peter Nash

Journal: University of Richmond Law Review

Volume: 27

First Page: 857

Year: 1993

Bluebook Citation: 27 U. RICH. L. REV. 857 (1993)

Author: Peter Nash Swisher: all 15 publications


Abstract

Over the past three decades, literally thousands of American products liability judicial opinions have explicitly referred to, and analyzed, section 402A of the Second Restatement of Torts. At least thirty-four states have judicially adopted section 402A, and five other states have passed specific statutes adopting the section.3 Since the landmark products liability case of Greenman v. Yuba Power Products,Inc.4 in 1963, at least forty-five states have now adopted some form of strict liability in tort remedy in American products liability actions.5 Only Virginia and four other states do not recognize a strict liability in tort remedy applied to state prod- ucts liability actions.'

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.